Embroidery -Puckering help needed.

By sroghen on Aug. 04, 2020

I’m out of ideas on this one.
I have reached out to a few companies but no recommendation has worked.
This is a woven type fabric.

Machine is Barudan 4-head BENY

Things done so far
- needles 75 and 80
- backing paper - tear away, cut-away - doubled up/quadrupled up.
- use speciality backing from Gunold - ActionBack
- used magnetic hoop and also regular hoop
- loosened tension on thread

I welcome any suggestions.

Attachment: 
Image icon 87588cf41b6b9-dbf2-477a-aef0-500d741ce00a-87588.jpeg
Image icon 8758991e3ce1e-40fb-4315-99c5-395079b1bccc-87589.jpeg
Submitted by sroghen on Wed, 08/05/2020 - 10:41

Thr digitizing has zigzag underlay, followed by edge. If i remove the zizag, there is definitely less puckering.

looks more likely to be digitizing issue.

Submitted by MMMEMB on Sat, 09/19/2020 - 12:37

sroghen wrote:
I’m out of ideas on this one.
I have reached out to a few companies but no recommendation has worked.
This is a woven type fabric.

Machine is Barudan 4-head BENY

Things done so far
- needles 75 and 80
- backing paper - tear away, cut-away - doubled up/quadrupled up.
- use speciality backing from Gunold - ActionBack
- used magnetic hoop and also regular hoop
- loosened tension on thread

I welcome any suggestions.

try with less dencity

Submitted by digidana on Thu, 08/06/2020 - 11:10

sroghen wrote:
Thr digitizing has zigzag underlay, followed by edge. If i remove the zizag, there is definitely less puckering.

looks more likely to be digitizing issue.

most likely the digitizing. split satins/turn fills don't work well done small on flimsy fabric. too many stitches on the inside corners, etc. i can't tell the size, but i'd either do it as a regular satin, or if the stitch width is over 6mm, a flat fill with a satin outline.

best you can do with that file on the embroidery side is use a stiff backing, and hoop tight, but not stretch the fabric if at all possible.

digitizing...since 1996. dixiedesigns.net

Submitted by sroghen on Wed, 08/19/2020 - 21:18

digidana wrote:
most likely the digitizing. split satins/turn fills don't work well done small on flimsy fabric. too many stitches on the inside corners, etc. i can't tell the size, but i'd either do it as a regular satin, or if the stitch width is over 6mm, a flat fill with a satin outline.

best you can do with that file on the embroidery side is use a stiff backing, and hoop tight, but not stretch the fabric if at all possible.

Thx. The original file was 9.5k stitching.
I had it redone to 7k - removing zigzag underlay and left with edge underlay. Much better but not ideal.

I’m using magnetic hoop, so it stretches the fabric. The best way I can describe this fabric is what bags are made of. The back is softer and more plastic-like.

Submitted by gulfcoastembroidery on Thu, 08/20/2020 - 17:23

digidana wrote:
most likely the digitizing. split satins/turn fills don't work well done small on flimsy fabric. too many stitches on the inside corners, etc. i can't tell the size, but i'd either do it as a regular satin, or if the stitch width is over 6mm, a flat fill with a satin outline.

best you can do with that file on the embroidery side is use a stiff backing, and hoop tight, but not stretch the fabric if at all possible.

You’re right I was paying more attention to the fabric then the stitch on there and the split satin is causing a huge problem bad nothing border without that on this material

Submitted by sroghen on Thu, 09/24/2020 - 21:27

I did reduce density. Can't go any lower without affecting the look.
I can only use magnetic hoop on this fabric - manual hoop is painful and too time consuming.

2025 © DigitSmith | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Contact